𝐄𝐃𝐈𝐓𝐎𝐑𝐈𝐀𝐋- 𝐐𝐮𝐨𝐭𝐚𝐬 𝐚𝐭 𝐖𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐂𝐨𝐬𝐭?

The issue of vehicle quotas in Bhutan, which first emerged in the 1980s, has resurfaced in recent parliamentary deliberations, prompting much-needed debate about fairness, economic priorities, and the long-term sustainability of government policies. Initially introduced to address the limited pool of government vehicles, the lack of public transport, and to ensure mobility for civil servants, vehicle quotas have now become a source of economic and ethical debate.

However, the very foundation that supported these quotas in the 1980s no longer aligns with present-day realities. Today, vehicle quotas have become less about facilitating essential movement and more about tax avoidance and privilege for a select few. With the Pay Structure Reform Act of 2022 eliminating quotas, many believed that this would be the end of the issue. Yet, recent developments have once again brought the topic to the forefront.

Let us examine the facts, each MP is entitled to a significant monthly budget to maintain their vehicles, yet this has led to unnecessary expenses in an already fragile economic environment. The system is disproportionately benefiting a small group of individuals while the majority of civil servants, especially at the ESP, GSP, and S levels, who are equally dedicated to serving the nation, are excluded from these quotas. This unequal distribution of privileges raises ethical questions about fairness and national priorities.

The central issue in this debate revolves around the distinction between responsibility and entitlement. Many MPs have monthly expenses exceeding the amount of their salaries for maintenance and fuel, leading to a situation where government resources are being stretched unnecessarily. While it is understandable that MPs require mobility to perform their duties, visiting their constituencies and engaging in legislative work, it is problematic to grant excessive financial support, especially when it creates an unfair system of entitlement.

The suspension of deliberations on this issue was a wise move by the National Assembly. At a time when the economy is struggling, the nation cannot afford the burden of millions in tax exemptions and lavish spending. The government must act with responsibility and recognize that citizens expect fairness, transparency, and equity in governance.

If vehicle quotas are to resurface in the future, the government must adopt stricter policies to ensure that fairness and economic stability are prioritized. A sensible step would be to place a cap on tax exemptions, perhaps limited to Nu 1.5 million, aligning with the cost of most mid-range vehicles. Furthermore, it is vital to add clear clauses stating that quotas cannot be sold or transferred and that any violations should result in taxation.

The Finance Minister has indicated that a report will be filed following the motion raised in Parliament. This is an important step, as consultation and transparent deliberation will ensure that the government and policymakers fully understand the economic impact of reinstating quotas and other related subsidies. Citizens, too, must play their role by engaging in constructive dialogue and demanding transparency from their elected officials.

The reinstatement of vehicle quotas, particularly given the unequal distribution of benefits and the economic strain they could impose, risks deepening inequities and economic challenges. If such decisions are to be made in the future, they must be accompanied by responsible reforms, tax limitations, and a commitment to equity for all civil servants, not just the privileged few.